Sunday, June 28, 2015

 

Sunday Punday Gig


Labels: ,


Saturday, June 27, 2015

 

On CitizenFour and Ed Snowden


I watched today CitizenFour, an Oscar winning documentary on the doings of Edward Snowden, in a cosy little theater on the 10th floor of the Films Society building in Peddar Road, Mumbai. The documentary is very real- it stars Edward Snowden as himself, Julian Assange as himself (in a blink-and-you-miss it appearance, mind you), with live interviewing of Snowden by the Director Glen Greenwald. It’s a bit tingling in that it’s very live- you are seeing Snowden at a time when the entire world, including the FBI and CIA, were trying to find him. Citizen Four is Snowden’s code name when he established contact with the Guardian journo. Greenwald won a Pulitzer for Public Service for what counts as a remarkable piece of journalism. Based on conversations with Avtansh, and some pondering thereafter, I write below.

The government having access to your entire data, while seeming like a distantly distasteful proposition, never struck home in my head as something truly terrifying. That's till today. But think about it- as the movie mentioned in passing, if the government can have complete access, any form of protests can never happen. Identify the dissidents, and ensure that all their tweets pass through your monitoring system, and voila, never can Tahrir Square happen. Or better still, invest 5x more, create the enabling technology, and you can monitor not just the dissidents, but everyone. And this is exactly what was happening – the NSA snooped on 1.2 Billion people. The world of East Germany where every envelope was unsealed , read, and resealed, and the tyrannies of the Stasi (East German secret police) as depicted poignantly in the Lives of Others, come to my mind. Just that the process now is automated and quicker and more efficient.

One major issue with governmental snooping is, how the government would decide where to draw the line on multiple fronts. The first line is the motive - What started as the war against terrorism, ended up with Angela Merkel’s phone being tapped. And once you have Merkel’s phone on tap, why not use it for Foreign policy decisions? Then comes the line on access – now if the head of Halliburton, who’s say the POTUS’ close chum and major campaign donor, has access to the line on the CEO of Transocean (France), what’s to stop him from getting access and getting winning information on a bid for drilling a well in Mozambique? And finally, the line between passive listening and active action- why listen and wait, why not suppress and thus nip the problem right in the bud?  If all these vaguely visible lines (and many more) are breached, then power becomes dangerously concentrated, in the hands of say the US, and more crucially, in the hands of a few individuals, say the POTUS, and a few others.

And what’s the issue with concentration of power? As long as it’s a democracy with all its checks and balances, its fine, right? No, remember Indira Gandhi. If she had access to complete information, and could suppress information of dissidents going behind bars, and what news gets reported, what’s to separate the India of 1975 from the India of 1984, replacing the Big Brother with the Big Sister?  Information is power, all information about everyone - a possibility in today’s world as demonstrated by the NSA – is absolute power. And absolute power corrupts absolutely. Even for the noblest of souls, it may be just too tempting.

Then there’s this associated issue of concentration of information. Because the NSA was not dealing with just verizon and AT&T, they were intercepting Google, Facebook and Skype, too. This has been adequately dealt with in a number of glamorous sci-fi books and movies, take for example Die Hard 4.0 and the Fire Sail. And this good Sci-fi book I read about robots gone rogue- Robocalypse, by (Robotics PhD) Daniel Wilson. The humans battle it out by "taking full advantage of human adaptability and ingenuity" and taking unpredictable actions such as moving only on terrains where robots can't move. Once you control information, in today’s networked world, you control a lot of physical assets. Including weapon systems. Automobiles. Trains. Robots. And telephones can be thought of as sensors - voice sensors. And with today's phones, sensing includes location, fitness, assets (through online purchases), video (through skype sessions), your social networks (who are your friends/vulnerabilities). That's a ridiculous amount of information for the government to justify holding, and lethal if it falls into the wrong hands.  

Thinking about it, a multipolar and decentralized world then has merits. Keep those big idealogical barriers alive between the Venezuelas and the Russias of the world, and the US - so these other poles can act as a “check and balance” and shelter the Assanges and the Snowden’s. It’s intriguing that Assange today actually heads an organization that helps procure asylum for political whistleblower. Thumbs up, Ju.

The movie mentions in passing that in today’s wide open and boundary-less world, privacy equals freedom, and taking away privacy means taking away freedom. Europe and the US, with their more individualistic culture and evolved dialogues on freedom and self-expression, are where the protests against snooping would be strongest. Collectivist cultures like Asia may not protest so vehemently against privacy invasions.

However, I wrote above, it’s mentioned in “passing”, and that’s where the issue with the movie CitizenFour lies – there are too many “in passing” references to intriguing lines of thought. It spends too much time initially on Ed Snowden the man, and that too without really doing a fabulous job of it, and the implications of snooping are left for passing remarks and brief clips from the CNNs and the BBCs. On such a fantastically thought provoking topic, the movie could have stoked much more.

Last words- this blog post mentions NSA a couple times, and Assange and Snowden a few times. Surely, the intelligent people at NSA would have put some filters to let this post and the author through to some level of scrutiny. While this is amusing to some degree, it is also slightly chilling. Think about it. 

Labels:


Sunday, June 07, 2015

 

2 Mumbai runways and 1 Flawed movie: Weekend wrap

2 Mumbai Runways by the sea
1. Bandra: Take off on Runway 1 at Taj Land's end, run along Bandstand, and then continue to the Carter Road causeway. You unfortunately have to brave the poor running connection from Bandstand. Once on the Carter road causeway, go up and back down. Pause for a moment at the giant bat autographed by Sachin Tendulkar and recall your favorite Sachin Tendulkar memory (mine's The One with Tony Greig). Finish with three rounds of Jogger's Park, which has been done up beautifully and offers a splendid view of the Sea Link. This run would give you a healthy 5 km. Before-After ideas: Food at Carter road.

2. Juhu Beach. Run along the length and stay close to the water where the sand is firm. The waves keep coming at you and it's fun to quickly dart away when they threaten to invade your path. Beware passerbys when doing the wave-dart. Oomph factor for this path: if it is raining, leave your phone at home and enjoy running uninhibitedly in the rain. And absolutely do not carry a book like I did today because it will get wet and become annoyingly wavy after drying. Before-After ideas: Movie at PVR Juhu (definitely a before because they do not want their theatre seats to nicely soak up all your sweat); a Cooler at Novotel by the beach.

I notched up an impressive 10.5 km over the weekend, spread over the two runways. Finally, putting my new Nike Free's to good use. Quite like them.

Tanu Weds Manu - the rise and the spectacular fall (some spoilers)
The first half started like a stereotypical Bollywood wedding movie, and rested on some hare-brained pieces of logic, such as Madhavan going to the madhouse, which annoyed me and my fellow watcher Ankit. However, halfway into the first half, when we realize that Madhavan is truly serious about this athlete version of Kangana, my interest is piqued. Voila, here's the first mainstream Bollywood movie dealing in a mature way with; 1. Failed relationships; 2. Divorce, 3. Remarrying. The twist before the interval is delicious. And halfway into the second half, with that speech by runner Kangana lambasting spoilt Kangana, and Madhavan telling spoilt Kangana- you ain't in ma head no more, I was satisfied at having watched a movie well made. Oh but wait, it's not over yet. Kangana the Spoilt and Kangana the Runner do unto the movie what they do unto themselves: 1) Spoil the movie, 2) Run it longer than necessary. The ending 1/4th leaves a horrible taste in the mouth, because from being a responsible and forward looking movie, it descends to being quite immature. Till 75%, I thought it was a good emotional roller coaster I had gotten onto, and was happy to get off the seat, but the turns after that were thoroughly unwelcome and made me throw up.

And thus TWM ended, and now MTW begins. Hello there, Monday!

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]